Some people believe that university students should pay all the cost of studies because university education only benefits students themselves not the society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
题目大意
有人认为，大学生应该支付所有的学习费用，因为大学教育只对学生自身有利，而不是对整个社会有利。你在多大程度上同意或不同意？
思路解析
这是一道观点类大作文，聊的是大学生是否应该自己承担学费。审题时需要注意题目中的因果关系：因为大学教育只利于个人不利于社会，所以大学生应该自己承担学费。我们可以分别对“因”和“果”进行反驳，即“大学教育不只是利于个人也利于社会”和“大学生自己承担学费是否合理”。下面月半鸭带大家来看具体观点。
首先来看大学教育带来的收益问题。
对于个人来说，大学教育能够让学生掌握更多知识和技能、提升自己的学历，这些对其之后的学术深造、就业都是有益的，能够给学生未来发展提供更多的选择和可能性。
对于社会来说，像科技、教育、工业、金融等领域都是需要大量人才来支持，而这些人才的培养的过程主要都由大学来承担。大学在培养学生的过程中，虽然看不出直接收益，但是学生掌握的知识在将来从事研究或者相关行业的时候，是能够发挥积极的作用，并且最后所产生的成果将会有益于整个社会的发展和进步。
然后来看大学生是否应该自己承担学费。一方面大学教育特别是公立大学作为政府提供的教育体系的一部分，既然纳税人以及缴纳了相应的税赋，那么政府就应该承担一部分学费而不是让个人自己承担全部。其次，对于那些家庭经济条件困难的学生，是很难自己承担全部学费的。但是，他们有受到高等教育的权利，特别是当他们还通过了统一的考试或其它公平的选拔后获取了上大学的资格。而这也有助于社会和阶级的流动和健康发展，因此政府或其他组织应该帮助这些经济条件薄弱的学生承担一些或者是全部的学费。
高分范文示例
I would argue in this essay how irrational the claim that university education would be worthless to the entire society but only benefits students themselves is and how ridiculous the logic is made by the topic.
Before scrutinizing whether the benefits are or are not gotten by the society, we must first consider what “benefit” is. There is definitely a universal definition of what “benefit” means, and usually it means the “advantage that may be resulted from an action”, and in that case, the whole society would really benefit from the sending of its students into university. such positive outcome mainly is reflected in the possible phenomenon, in which the society would largely have talents on specific areas that may mostly contribute to its own paces. This is mainly because once the enrollment of college is implemented, students that are with qualified learning capabilities would be imparted with the majors that are directly linked to the further development of the society in every aspect. That may, superficially, not allow some to see past the immediate return that this action may bring because of a relatively long-period (at least 3 or 4 years) nurture, and rob them of the opportunity to recognize the potential that lies, but one must know that the knowledge given to the education receivers, and the giftedness that is discovered during the process are what lays the foundation of all the reasonings that follows. Certain university students or graduates may not seem like much or certainly may not surmount to anything on its own. However, sets of related talents, experts and professionals in all areas grouped together are what constitutes insights into new discoveries, theories into practices that are close to the life power of a social community, or one day may also the cornerstone of other even more crucial breakthroughs.
The fault premise, then seems directly leading to the unpersuasive property of the belief claiming that students should bear all the costs of the university on their own, but the truth may somehow overstep this recognition. Before establishing a causality, one must first deeply consider whether the reasons are necessarily correlated to their possible outcomes. However, the policy with regard to any public expenses to the per-capita well-being from the authority is not directly related to whether the society as a whole would make profits from this, but to whether the related welfare would be fairly and credibly enjoyed by almost every tax-payer; that means, ergo, any proposal of fiscal giving out would sound reasonable if it is truly necessary in meeting the living requirement of most residents on the basis of ensure the balance of all the financial allocations. It is then clear that the education output concerning university students is really doable, because the high-level education, on the one hand, is definitely a common, fundamental enjoyment that is endowed to any internal dweller who has the ability to be enrolled after passing the related tests and examinations, and becomes actually difficult to some in terms of the tuitions and other educational expenses on the other. What the governmental act, therefore, should be to break down the barriers for those who have talents but would be precluded from the path to college education because of impoverishment; there is certainly no need for them to pay all the costs of their studies, no matter who would truly benefit from this.
In conclusion, I would very much disagree that the society would be not a beneficiary in the university education, and that students have to pay all the studying expenses is impractical and is out of the correlation to who can actually be advantageous.
相关词汇和语法结构
Irrational 不合理的
Scrutinize 验证
Potential 潜力
Premise 前提
Causality 因果关系
如果你想了解更多雅思托福课程，留学规划或者有任何疑问，欢迎联系新航道重庆学校。
新航道重庆学校官网：cq.xhd.cn
新航道重庆学校官方电话：400-185-9090
推荐阅读：
一起来唠唠出国留学英国后的那些“坑”，用自己的血泪教训给大家排个雷~
关于QS排名前100的澳洲院校的花费大全来啦，想去这些学校的小伙伴们有没有准备好钱包呀？
